News

fine

News about fine: events, facts and developments on tafs uz.

8 stories

EU approves Temu's plan to remedy violations after a €200 million fine

The European Commission has accepted Temu's action plan to remedy violations of the Digital Services Act. The company has committed to conducting a risk assessment, strengthening oversight of illegal goods, and revising its recommender algorithms. Earlier, the Chinese marketplace was fined €200 million, and new fees on cheap parcels have already cut imports by 30–40%.

2 min read

Developer fined in Tashkent for damaging graves near a construction site

The Tashkent inspection for control in construction and housing and communal services, together with partner organizations, examined a case of damage to graves at a cemetery in the Yashnabad district. Earthworks near the cemetery were carried out without permits and in violation of urban planning norms; due to the contractor's negligence, the cemetery wall and some graves were damaged. It was previously reported that a wall of the Botkin cemetery collapsed due to construction on the territory of a former champagne factory.

1 min read

In Tashkent, a wall collapsed near the Botkin cemetery during construction and gravestones were damaged; the developer was fined 88 million soums

During earthworks on the territory of the former champagne winery in Tashkent, a wall separating the construction site from the Botkin cemetery collapsed. Several gravestones in the 15th sector were damaged; the burials were not opened. The works were carried out without permits and have been suspended; the construction organization was fined 200 BRV (88 million soums), and the client and contractor are obliged to restore the gravestones by the end of the week.

2 min read

Competition Committee fined Akhangarancement for failing cement deliveries

The Tashkent regional department of the Competition Committee fined Akhangarancement for failing to fulfill contracts with the firms Sarkor-Ishonch-777 and East, concluded in November-December 2025. The company did not ship cement on time and failed to properly fulfill its obligations under exchange trades. The appellate board upheld the decision.

1 min read